An external coach on an organization's roster has recently been selected to work with a senior leader. Recently promoted, the Client comes to coaching with a familiar goal: to better manage her time, be more present at work and at home, and, most of all, find peace of mind.
The Coach's assessment is that the Client is under significant pressure. She is constantly available, constantly interrupted, and bracing for the next demand. Her phone has become a symbol of a system that never shuts off.
So the Coach begins exploring the phone. What happens after dinner? What does the Client check? What does she fear missing? What would happen if she were less available in the evenings?
At first, this sounds like a practical coaching conversation about boundaries and attention. But then the Client says she cannot simply turn off her phone or put it on DND.
One of her direct reports texts or calls her late at night when he is "in a bad place." He fears he may lose his job due to rumors of organizational restructuring and repeatedly seeks reassurance from his supervisor. The Client describes him as "emotionally fragile." She says she knows HR should probably be involved, but she has not pushed for their involvement because the direct report pleads with her:
The Coach asks a few more questions, and the conversation rounds a blind corner. Until recently, this VP wasn't a direct report — he was a peer, and the two had become close friends and confidantes. Then the promotion happened. Overnight, the Client stepped onto a higher rung, and what had been side by side became up and down.
It is not exactly unique, but it is unusual enough that the Coach knows who it is.
The Coach's stomach tightens.
Eighteen months earlier, the Coach had worked with this same VP in a separate coaching engagement. During that engagement, the VP reported seeing a therapist for anxiety and said things were going well. At the time, the Coach had no reason to be concerned or to take any action beyond providing the standard care expected of a professional coach.
But now the Coach's current Client, the VP's boss, is describing a blurred friendship/reporting relationship defined by after-hours texts and an excessive reliance on the boss for reassurance.
Whether the SVP knows about the VP's therapy is secondary. The immediate, primary question concerns confidentiality: What can the Coach ethically do with information from a prior coaching relationship when that information becomes relevant or appears relevant in the current engagement?
The answer cannot be "Use it carefully." That is too vague. The answer also cannot be "Pretend not to know it." That is psychologically unrealistic. The Coach does know. The prior disclosure is now part of her inner experience, like an invisible third chair. It may affect what she notices, what she worries about, what she wants to ask, and what she feels pulled to do.
If compelled, the Coach asked — "Has he sought counseling?" — even in a neutral tone, the question would likely not feel clean within the Coach.
And if her Client replied, "Why do you ask?" the Coach would be cornered.
Ethical work in this tricky situation involves placing prior knowledge where it properly belongs, in its original file drawer.
What lines of inquiry would you pursue?
Bottom line: If you coach in organizations long enough, someone will eventually name someone you know — a former client or sponsor. Supervision provides a space for dialogue to handle confidentiality and the systemic and internal pressures that shape a coach's choices.
← All articles